Archive for January, 2017

TT: The Psionics Challenge

January 5, 2017

JANE:  Happy New Year!  (I was so busy thinking about what next that I forgot to say this yesterday!)  Here’s hoping that 2017 is a year of peace and goodwill to all.

ALAN: And a Happy New Year to all of you from me as well.

Very Different Takes

Very Different Takes

JANE: Last time we talked about how editor John W. Campbell’s interest in psionic powers led to a great many stories taking a more serious look at the implications of these powers.  I can see you bouncing up and down and waving your hand, so why don’t you take over?

ALAN: Thank you.  One of my favourite writers from this period was Mark Clifton. He was an early adopter of Campbell’s enthusiasm for psionics. He’s largely forgotten these days, but in the 1950s he wrote some magnificent psi-based stories for Campbell which laid the groundwork for much that came later.

JANE: I fear I’m one of those who never knew of his work, so I can’t say I’ve “forgotten” him as such, but clearly I need enlightening.  Please tell me more.

ALAN: A good example of Clifton’s work is the very funny story “What Thin Partitions”. It was the first of a series of four novelettes about Ralph Kennedy, a personnel director (these days we’d call him a Human Relations director) who works for a large industrial company. A chemist in the company has invented something he calls a “chemical impulse storer”. It’s a sludge that can learn things from thought waves. The narrator has an argument with someone who gets very upset with him and who uses her telekinetic ability to completely wreck his office. The sludge learns how to repel gravity from this incident. The rest of the story concerns Kennedy’s efforts to reproduce the effect so as to make a fortune from selling gravity repelling capsules…

In this and other stories, Clifton offers a nice explanation of how psionic powers might work:

“…there may be any number of frameworks, separated from one another by perhaps the thinnest of partitions, each containing its own set of real world conditions, natural laws, consistent within itself, obeying its own logic, having its own peculiar cause-effect-sequences.”

JANE: And thus the title of his story…

ALAN: …which is actually a quote from Alexander Pope’s poem Essay on Man:

“Remembrance and reflection how allied!
What thin partitions Sense from Thought divide!”

Guess what the title of the sequel to Clifton’s story was?

JANE: Let me guess.  Perhaps “Sense From Thought Divide”?

ALAN: That’s exactly right! Clifton must have been very fond of Pope’s poem. He also wrote a story called “Remembrance and Reflection”, but Campbell didn’t publish that one. It appeared in The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction in 1958.

Many of Clifton’s stories are now in the public domain and can be downloaded from Project Gutenberg. They are still very well worth reading. I think it’s a great shame that Clifton fell so quickly out of favour. Other people seem to agree with me – in 2010 he received the Cordwainer Smith Rediscovery Award for unjust obscurity.

JANE: I’ll definitely need to look into his work.

As I mentioned last week, Campbell’s enthusiasm for psionics created a SF trope that went far beyond the covers of the magazines he edited.  Psi-powers began to show up everywhere.   One author who used them widely and thoughtfully was Marion Zimmer Bradley, most specifically in her “Darkover” series.  Although the planetary culture of Darkover has medieval trappings – swords, horses, fur-lined cloaks, and suchlike – the series began as a “lost colony” tale.

When some members of a stranded colony ship interbreed with the natives of the planet, psionic abilities enter the human gene pool, as well as a tendency for some people to have six fingers and a more willowy build.

The tales might have become mere sword and sorcery, with psionics instead of spells, except that Bradley created an elaborate psionic technology which used matrix crystals that amplified the abilities.  To me, especially as a college student (which I was when I first discovered the books, many of which had been written far earlier) this gave a solidity and reality to what would otherwise have been vague occult powers.

Oh…  I will add that there were consequences to the use of psionic powers, too, tremendous ones, which with the people of Darkover in the “present” time are still coming to terms with.

ALAN: Just to come a bit more up to date, I’m very fond of Steven Gould’s 1992 novel Jumper. The young David Rice discovers an unexpected ability to teleport himself – the power initially manifests itself when David uses it to escape from a physically abusive situation. Once he learns to control his teleportation, he uses it in several very ingenious ways to provide himself with money, food and shelter. In this novel and its several sequels Steven Gould carefully examines the long term consequences of teleportation and even speculates a little bit about the physics that might lie behind it.

JANE: Jumper also falls into the “wish fulfillment” category – but what’s different about Steve’s treatment is that David eventually has to face the moral and ethical implications of what he’s doing with his power.

ALAN: That’s what raises Jumper out of the ordinary. On the one hand we’ve got an exciting and ingenious story which asks what it means to be human and on the other hand we have the clever use of a very science fictional idea to try and answer the question.

Interestingly, the idea of teleportation first manifesting itself as a means of escape from peril has been used to great effect in other stories as well.

JANE:  I’d love to talk about that, but how about next time?

Non-Linear Planning

January 4, 2017

The last couple of weeks, I took off to concentrate on the holidays and enjoy the company of my visiting mother and on-holiday husband.

Keeping Track

Keeping Track

It was very good for me.  Among other things, I thought of an idea for a novel that I’m very eager to start researching.  However, although this is (of course) what I want to work on more than anything else (because shiny/new is exciting), I have a list of other projects I’ve promised myself to work on.

So, Monday morning as I was moving from asleep to awake, I found my mind wandering toward how could I find time to work on a new project while not letting the older ones go stale?

And late Monday morning, when checking my Twitter feed, I came across a link from Kate Eliot to a piece by Amanda Hackwith on a bullet journal which may provide the solution to my difficulty.

What I particularly liked about this idea was how Ms. Hackwith has adapted the idea of a bullet journal (which I had to look up, since I had no idea what she meant) to the erratic pulse points of a writer’s life.  As she notes in her blog post:

“The life of a writer means I have a hundred things to keep track of at once, but not always on a precise day by day itinerary. If I stuck to the traditional appointments + daily to dos format, my days would be a constant repeat of something like ‘Write word count, Edit X, read, check email anxiously.’”

Well, did this ever sound familiar!  Last year I started keeping a list on a scrap of paper under my computer monitor so I wouldn’t forget to do the things I do every week – like write these Wanderings, work on Tangents with Alan, write the Friday Fragments, make sure photos are taken for above – as well as those things that crop up more erratically (like updating my website News and Appearances).

And, of course, whatever I’m writing, because I usually have something going on in one stage or another – often in multiple stages or other.

Ms. Hackwith has some neat ideas for how to adapt the bullet journal to the differing demands of a writer’s life.  I’ll definitely try some, adapt others.  I already keep a journal for what I’m reading, but a list of books I’d like to read is a nice idea.

I also liked her idea of listing accomplishments.  On that slip of paper I keep under my monitor, I make checkmarks each time I do a repetitive task (work on a story, respond to a Tangent, edit a manuscript) and I cross off completed tasks.  And at the end of the week, I toss the slip of paper and start over.  This has led to a sense of Sisyphean toil.  The same jobs crop up, but with no record of what I’ve done over time, there’s very little sense of accomplishment.

An on-going record – like the one I keep for my reading – would give me that.  Good idea!

When I’m working on a long project, I keep track of word count.  However, I’ve found that when I’m not, I fail to keep any steady record of what I’ve been doing.  This leads to a (completely fallacious) sense that I’ve done nothing.

Right now, I’m contemplating a variety of projects.  I have a novel that’s pretty much done, but will need a final polish.  I want to get some more of my backlist out as e-books.  And then there’s the new Shiny New Idea.  Oh, and a couple more short story ideas…  And research…  And…

I think a non-linear method of tracking what I’ve done, as well as what I’d like to do, will be a good thing at this stage in my life.

An investment in a journal designed for flexibility seems like a good way to not only keep track, but to remind myself that – unlike Sisyphus – I am getting somewhere.