One of the Cards from the Exhibit
Last week my writing mostly focused on background work for various projects. There now exists an updated and extensive list of characters from the first three Star Kingdom novels. Cover copy has been written for the upcoming new releases of my three “Breaking the Wall” novels. Stuff like that…
Then, this past weekend, as a change of pace, Jim and I went to see the Jim Henson exhibit at the Albuquerque Museum. One of the pleasures for me in the exhibit was seeing how various projects and characters developed. I’m not really a “making of” sort of viewer. I’m the sort who wants to believe for those couple of hours that whatever place I’m viewing and the people who live in it are real.
However, seeing how Henson and his team brought script and characters together—especially how the process evolved over time, and as different collaborators became regulars in the team—was fascinating. I found myself feeling better about the amount of background work I’d been doing for my own projects.
It also made me think about a comment Beverly Martin, one of the regular participants in my FF, had made about a book she was reading. Let me quote her:
“It is kind of suffering from middle book syndrome – lots of words but little movement in the main plot. I get that they move on horseback, but does the story have to move at the same pace?”
Even as I understood her point, I found myself thinking about what it implied. For one, there’s the question of “main plot.” When I was a very young reader of the “Lord of the Rings” novels, my least favorite novel was The Two Towers, especially Frodo and Sam’s journey. There were none of the clashing armies, none of the hints of romance, none of the moments of humor that livened not only the other two books in the series but the other major plotline.
Frodo, Sam, and Golem’s journey was a tale that moved not only “on horseback” but on foot, through the mud, up endless staircases, and, even worse, into increasingly thick bogs of distrust, suspicion, and even outright hatred and betrayal.
And, as an older reader, I realize that this is the most crucial part of the entire epic tale, without which not only the climax of the story, but also the concerns felt by the rest of the Fellowship and allies would seem groundless, shallow, and weak.
I’m not saying this is the case for the book Beverly is reading. (If you want to know which one, you can look on the FF for last week.) Sometimes writers do lose touch or reach a point where they are indulged because they can be counted on to sell a fair number of copies to loyal fans.
A friend of mine recently confessed that she wishes a writer whose work she used to love received more editing because she had found his more recent works “turgid.”
One thing I’ve learned is that the answer to what makes a book “slow” varies widely, not only from author to author, but from reader to reader. The other day, I had a lively chat with a friend who is reading my Wolf’s Head, Wolf’s Heart for the first time. He had numerous questions about the “societies” that are mentioned as a background element in the cultures of Hawk Haven and Bright Bay. I could tell him a considerable amount that never made it to the page.
Almost every novel I’ve written, particularly if it belongs to a series, has a host of background material that may never make it onto the page. If there’s a point where things seem to “slow down,” perhaps because I’m providing background material or seem to have strayed from the plot… Well, maybe I haven’t strayed. Maybe I know a little more about what the “main plot” is than a reader who may be misled by anything from jacket copy to what the characters themselves think is important.
Which brings us back to the behind the scenes elements of the Jim Henson exhibit. A friend had enthused that Jareth and Sarah’s costumes from the iconic ballroom scene were on display. I was certainly eager to see them. In the end, while I appreciated the opportunity, I could have done without.
Gowns and jackets meant to be filmed, meant to be seen with perfect lighting picking up the highlights, may not look as wonderful on a dummy in a case. I’ll take the illusion. I’ll take the story. But, y’know, I’d also take Jareth’s jacket! (Or the wonderful silver pendant.)
And I’ll keep writing more material than the reader will ever see, because, just like the support rod that’s invisible but makes the puppet’s arm movements possible, so background that is only hinted at supports the rest of the story.
Jane Lindskold: Wednesday Wanderings 